A comparison of mobile patient monitoring systems

Authors:
Gaurav Paliwal;Arvind W. Kiwelekar
Affiliations:
Department of Computer Engineering, Dr. B.A. Technological University, Raigad, M.S., India;Department of Computer Engineering, Dr. B.A. Technological University, Raigad, M.S., India
Venue:
HIS'13 Proceedings of the second international conference on Health Information Science
Year:
2013

Citing 8
Cited 0

Mobile messaging services-based personal electrocardiogram monitoring system

International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications
Congestion-aware, loss-resilient bio-monitoring sensor networking for mobile health applications

IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications - Special issue on wireless and pervasive communications for healthcare
Body Sensor Networks for Mobile Health Monitoring: Experience in Europe and Australia

ICDS '10 Proceedings of the 2010 Fourth International Conference on Digital Society
Security and privacy for mobile electronic health monitoring and recording systems

WOWMOM '10 Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM)
The DEDUCE Guided Query tool: Providing simplified access to clinical data for research and quality improvement

Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Empath: a continuous remote emotional health monitoring system for depressive illness

Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Wireless Health
A Remote Patient Monitoring System for Congestive Heart Failure

Journal of Medical Systems
A framework for the comparison of mobile patient monitoring systems

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

A survey of Mobile Patient Monitoring Systems is presented in this paper. Mobile patient monitoring systems have shown progress in terms of basic core functionalities needed for monitoring and detection of biosignals. However, their deployment is restricted to a small segment of health care delivery. The objective of this survey is to identify causes behind low deployment. We have selected twelve mobile patient monitoring systems and compared them against a set of functional and non-functional requirements.