Introductory programming: examining the exams

  • Authors:
  • Simon;Donald Chinn;Michael de Raadt;Anne Philpott;Judy Sheard;Mikko-Jussi Laakso;Daryl D'Souza;James Skene;Angela Carbone;Tony Clear;Raymond Lister;Geoff Warburton

  • Affiliations:
  • University of Newcastle;University of Washington, Tacoma;Moodle;Auckland University of Technology;Monash University;University of Turku;RMIT University;Auckland University of Technology;Monash University;Auckland University of Technology;University of Technology Sydney;Australia

  • Venue:
  • ACE '12 Proceedings of the Fourteenth Australasian Computing Education Conference - Volume 123
  • Year:
  • 2012

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper describes a classification scheme that can be used to investigate the characteristics of introductory programming examinations. The scheme itself is described and its categories explained. We describe in detail the process of determining the level of agreement among classifiers, that is, the inter-rater reliability of the scheme, and we report the results of applying the classification scheme to 20 introductory programming examinations. We find that introductory programming examinations vary greatly in the coverage of topics, question styles, skill required to answer questions and the level of difficulty of questions. This study is part of a project that aims to investigate the nature and composition of formal examination instruments used in the summative assessment of introductory programming students, and the pedagogical intentions of the educators who construct these instruments.