ArgTrust: decision making with information from sources of varying trustworthiness

Authors:
Simon Parsons;Elizabeth Sklar;Jordan Salvit;Holly Wall;Zimi Li
Affiliations:
CUNY Brooklyn College, New York, NY, USA;CUNY Brooklyn College, New York, NY, USA;CUNY Graduate Center, New York, NY, USA;CUNY Brooklyn College, New York, NY, USA;CUNY Graduate Center, New York, NY, USA
Venue:
Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems
Year:
2013

Citing 4
Cited 0

A Reasoning Model Based on the Production of Acceptable Arguments

Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Computing and applying trust in web-based social networks

Computing and applying trust in web-based social networks
Trust representation and aggregation in a distributed agent system

AAAI'06 proceedings of the 21st national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2
Using argumentation to reason about trust and belief1

Journal of Logic and Computation

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This work aims to support decision making in situations where sources of information are of varying trustworthiness. Formal argumentation is used to capture the relationships between such information sources and conclusions drawn from them. A prototype implementation is demonstrated, applied to a problem from military decision making.