Towards a metrics suite for object oriented design
OOPSLA '91 Conference proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications
Evaluating the cost of software quality
Communications of the ACM
Using information scent to model user information needs and actions and the Web
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
A Methodology for Evaluating Software Engineering Methods and Tools
Proceedings of the International Workshop on Experimental Software Engineering Issues: Critical Assessment and Future Directions
Journal of Software Maintenance: Research and Practice
Questions programmers ask during software evolution tasks
Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering
Information Needs in Collocated Software Development Teams
ICSE '07 Proceedings of the 29th international conference on Software Engineering
The influence of organizational structure on software quality: an empirical case study
Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering
Measuring developer contribution from software repository data
Proceedings of the 2008 international working conference on Mining software repositories
Visually localizing design problems with disharmony maps
Proceedings of the 4th ACM symposium on Software visualization
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Software quality assessment shall monitor and guide the evolution of a system based on quality measurements. This continuous process should ideally involve multiple stakeholders and provide adequate information for each of them to use. We want to support an effective selection of quality measurements based on the type of software and individual information needs of the involved stakeholders. We propose an approach that brings together quality measurements and individual information needs for a context-sensitive tailoring of information related to a software quality assessment. We address the following research question: How can we better support different stakeholders in the quality assessment of a software system? For that we will devise theories, models, and prototypes to capture their individual information needs, tailor information from software repositories to these needs, and enable a contextual analysis of the quality aspects. Such a context-sensitive tailoring will provide a effective and individual view on the latest development trends in a project. We outline the milestones as well as evaluation approaches in this paper.