A comparison of the Essence 1.0 and SPEM 2.0 specifications for software engineering methods

Authors:
Brian Elvesæter;Gorka Benguria;Sylvia Ilieva
Affiliations:
SINTEF ICT, Oslo, Norway;TECNALIA R&I, Zamudio, Spain;IICT-BAS, acad., Sofia, Bulgaria
Venue:
Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Process-Based Approaches for Model-Driven Engineering
Year:
2013

Citing 7
Cited 0

The rationale of powertype-based metamodelling to underpin software development methodologies

APCCM '05 Proceedings of the 2nd Asia-Pacific conference on Conceptual modelling - Volume 43
Definition of an Executable SPEM 2.0

APSEC '07 Proceedings of the 14th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference
Metamodelling for Software Engineering

Metamodelling for Software Engineering
Metamodeling for Method Engineering

Metamodeling for Method Engineering
Using the Agile Unified Process in Banking

IEEE Software
Agile Model Driven Development: An Intelligent Compromise

SERA '11 Proceedings of the 2011 Ninth International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications
Refounding software engineering: the semat initiative (invited presentation)

Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Software Engineering

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In this paper we present a comparison of the draft Essence 1.0 and SPEM 2.0 specifications for software engineering methods. The comparison is based on results from the REMICS research project where we are defining an agile methodology for model-driven modernization of legacy applications to service clouds.