Indifferent attachment: the role of degree in ranking friends

  • Authors:
  • David Liben-Nowell;Carissa Knipe;Calder Coalson

  • Affiliations:
  • Carleton College, Northfield, MN;Carleton College, Northfield, MN;Carleton College, Northfield, MN

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining
  • Year:
  • 2013

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Each user of the MySpace social network can designate a small subset of her friends as Top Friends, placing them in a rank-ordered list displayed prominently on her profile. By examining users' #1 (best) and #2 (second-best) friends, we discover that MySpace users are nearly indifferent to these two friends' popularities when choosing which to designate as their best friend. Other pairs of ranks (e.g., #1-vs.-#3, #2-vs.-#3, ...) also reveal no marked preference for a popular friend over a less popular one. To the extent that ranking decisions form a window into broader decisions about whom to befriend at all, these observations suggest that positing individuals' tendency to attach to popular people---as in network-growth models like preferential attachment---may not suffice to explain the heavy-tailed degree distributions seen in real networks.