Quality of Service Control in High-Speed Networks
Quality of Service Control in High-Speed Networks
Policy-Based Network Management: Solutions for the Next Generation (The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Networking)
Bill-and-keep and the economics of interconnection in next-generation networks
Telecommunications Policy
SLA Design and Service Provisioning for Outsourced Services
Journal of Network and Systems Management
Broadband investment and regulation: A literature review
Telecommunications Policy
End-to-end quality of service specification and mapping: The third party approach
Computer Communications
IP Communications and Services for NGN
IP Communications and Services for NGN
A survey of QoE assurance in converged networks
Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking
Network topologies: inference, modeling, and generation
IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
Technical challenges in the delivery of interprovider QoS
IEEE Communications Magazine
Comparative study of protocols for dynamic service negotiation in the next-generation Internet
IEEE Communications Magazine
Pricing and revenue sharing strategies for Internet service providers
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON)
On the problem of revenue sharing in multi-domain federations
IFIP'12 Proceedings of the 11th international IFIP TC 6 conference on Networking - Volume Part II
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Next generation network (NGN) should facilitate a single party to establish quality of service (QoS) enabled path between the two IP providers mutually interconnected by one or more transit providers. For that purpose, an end-to-end service level agreement (SLA) should be negotiated and maintained. In this article, we propose interconnection charging, which is controlled by the end-to-end SLA. Relationships between the required, offered, and actually achieved inter-provider QoS are quantified through the degrees of offering and provisioning, at both end-to-end and per-domain levels. Nominal retail price offered to end users and interconnection costs related with particular SLA are then corrected if needed, depending on the offered and provisioned QoS levels. We further propose five policies for interconnection charging and compare them under different QoS provisioning scenarios. Results of the analysis indicate that a properly selected SLA-controlled interconnection charging policy should encourage providers: (1) to offer services with different QoS levels; (2) to offer service that perfectly or most approximately matches the required QoS and (3) to achieve the contracted QoS level.