An empirical model for predicting cross-core performance interference on multicore processors
PACT '13 Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Parallel architectures and compilation techniques
Accelerating Dynamic Detection of Uses of Undefined Values with Static Value-Flow Analysis
Proceedings of Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization
A constraint-weaving approach to points-to analysis for AspectJ
Frontiers of Computer Science: Selected Publications from Chinese Universities
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Andersen's pointer analysis becomes more precise when applied with full heap cloning but unscalable for large, heap-intensive programs. In contrast, k-callsite-sensitive heap cloning can be faster but less precise for some programs. In this paper, we make one step forward by enhancing Andersen's analysis with QUery-Directed Adaptive (QUDA) heap cloning for optimizing compilers. The novelty of our analysis, called QUDA, lies in performing k-callsite-sensitive heap cloning iteratively, starting with k = 0 (without heap cloning), so that an abstract heap object is cloned at iteration k = i + 1 only if some mayalias queries that are not answered positively at iteration k = i may now be answered more precisely. QUDA, which is implemented in Open64, has the same precision as the state-of-the-art, FULCRA, a version of QUDA with exhaustive heap cloning, but is significantly more scalable. For 10 SPEC2000 C benchmarks and 5 C applications (totalling 840 KLOC) evaluated, QUDA takes only 4+ minutes but exhaustive heap cloning takes 42+ minutes to complete. QUDA takes only 75.1 % of the time that Open64 takes on average to compile these 15 programs under “-O2”.