A trainable document summarizer
SIGIR '95 Proceedings of the 18th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
The use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries
Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
New Methods in Automatic Extracting
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
COLING '98 Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 2
Trainable, scalable summarization using robust NLP and machine learning
COLING '98 Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 1
Mining and summarizing customer reviews
Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
Centroid-based summarization of multiple documents
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
A sentimental education: sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts
ACL '04 Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
Graph-based ranking algorithms for sentence extraction, applied to text summarization
ACLdemo '04 Proceedings of the ACL 2004 on Interactive poster and demonstration sessions
Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by Gibbs sampling
ACL '05 Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
COLING-ACL '06 Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on Main conference poster sessions
A global optimization framework for meeting summarization
ICASSP '09 Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing
Topic-dependent sentiment analysis of financial blogs
Proceedings of the 1st international CIKM workshop on Topic-sentiment analysis for mass opinion
The automatic creation of literature abstracts
IBM Journal of Research and Development
Recognizing stances in online debates
ACL '09 Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP: Volume 1 - Volume 1
Recognizing stances in ideological on-line debates
CAAGET '10 Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text
A pilot study of opinion summarization in conversations
HLT '11 Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies - Volume 1
Sentiment analysis of Twitter data
LSM '11 Proceedings of the Workshop on Languages in Social Media
Cats rule and dogs drool!: classifying stance in online debate
WASSA '11 Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis
Stanford's multi-pass sieve coreference resolution system at the CoNLL-2011 shared task
CONLL Shared Task '11 Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task
Feature specific sentiment analysis for product reviews
CICLing'12 Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing - Volume Part I
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Social networking sites provide users a virtual community interaction platform to share their thoughts, life experiences and opinions. Online debate forum is one such platform where people can take a stance and argue in support or opposition of debate topics. An important feature of such forums is that, they are dynamic and increase rapidly. In such situations, effective opinion summarization approaches are needed so that readers need not go through the entire debate. This paper aims to summarize online debates by extracting highly topic relevant and sentiment rich sentences. The proposed approach takes into account topic relevant, document relevant and sentiment based features to capture topic opinionated sentences. ROUGE scores are used to evaluate our system. Our system significantly outperforms several baseline systems and show 5.2% (ROUGE-1), 7.3% (ROUGE-2) and 5.5% (ROUGE-L) improvement over the state-of-the-art opinion summarization system. The results verify that topic directed sentiment features are most important to generate effective debate summaries.