Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification
WWW '05 Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web
CARD: a decision-guidance framework and application for recommending composite alternatives
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems
Collaborative Filtering for Implicit Feedback Datasets
ICDM '08 Proceedings of the 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining
BPR: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback
UAI '09 Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
Fast als-based matrix factorization for explicit and implicit feedback datasets
Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems
Niche Product Retrieval in Top-N Recommendation
WI-IAT '10 Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 01
Rank and relevance in novelty and diversity metrics for recommender systems
Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems
Alternating least squares for personalized ranking
Proceedings of the sixth ACM conference on Recommender systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper we discuss a method to incorporate diversity into a personalised ranking objective, in the context of ranking-based recommendation using implicit feedback. The goal is to provide a ranking of items that respects user preferences while also tending to rank diverse items closely together. A prediction formula is learned as the product of user and item feature vectors, in order to minimise the mean squared error objective used previously in the RankALS and RankSGD methods, but modified to weight the difference in ratings between two items by the dissimilarity of those items. We report on preliminary experiments with this modified objective, in which the minimisation is carried out using stochastic gradient descent. We show that rankings based on the output of the minimisation succeed in producing recommendation lists with greater diversity, with just a small loss in relevance of the recommendation, as measured by the error rate.