A Cooperative MAC Protocol for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks
PERCOMW '07 Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops
Weighted cross-layer cooperative beamforming for wireless networks
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
A distributed energy-efficient clustering protocol for wireless sensor networks
Computers and Electrical Engineering
A detailed review of energy-efficient medium access control protocols for mobile sensor networks
Computers and Electrical Engineering
A Cooperative Diversity-Based Robust MAC Protocol in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks
IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Distributed space-time-coded protocols for exploiting cooperative diversity in wireless networks
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Cooperative Strategies and Capacity Theorems for Relay Networks
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Computers and Electrical Engineering
Hi-index | 0.00 |
An unreliable wireless communication environment and limited energy resources have a severe impact on the Quality of Service (QoS) of Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs). To improve network performance, an Energy-balanced Cooperative Media Access Control (EC-MAC) protocol in MANETs is proposed in this paper. It adopts the best partnership selection algorithm based on opportunistic relaying to select the cooperative node with the best channel conditions, highest transmission rate and most balanced energy consumption. The simulation results of EC-MAC, Cooperative MAC (CoopMAC) and IEEE 802.11 Distributed Coordination Function (DCF) protocols show that EC-MAC outperforms the other two protocols in terms of the packet delivery ratio, network throughput and network lifetime under two distinct channel noise levels, especially under the bad channel condition. Meanwhile, the EC-MAC protocol does not increase the average end-to-end delay compared with IEEE 802.11 DCF.