A discussion training support system and its evaluation

Authors:
Shumpei Kubosawa;Kei Nishina;Masaki Sugimoto;Shogo Okada;Katsumi Nitta
Affiliations:
Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan;Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan;Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan;Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan;Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan
Venue:
Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
Year:
2013

Citing 4
Cited 0

On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games

Artificial Intelligence
Modeling Legal Arguments: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals

Modeling Legal Arguments: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals
Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples

Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples
Reflective visualization of the agreement quality in mediation

JSAI-isAI'09 Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on New frontiers in artificial intelligence

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In law schools, to teach argumentation skills, training for discussion is sometimes conducted. However, giving advice and evaluating each discussion takes long time. This paper introduces the overview of a discussion analysis tool. It helps instructors to analyze the discussion records by observing topic flow of the discussion and by comparing it with that of another record. This system translates the discussion records into a form of a time-sequenced speech acts and an argumentation diagram, and then calculates several features of the discussion record which are used to evaluate such a record. The overview of the system and its evaluation are introduced here.