Towards a taxonomy of suspected forgery in authorship attribution field: a case: Montale's Diario postumo

  • Authors:
  • Francesca Tomasi;Ilaria Bartolini;Federico Condello;Mirko Degli Esposti;Valentina Garulli;Matteo Viale

  • Affiliations:
  • University of Bologna, Bologna (Italy);University of Bologna, Bologna (Italy);University of Bologna, Bologna (Italy);University of Bologna, Bologna (Italy);University of Bologna, Bologna (Italy);University of Bologna, Bologna (Italy)

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Collaborative Annotations in Shared Environment: metadata, vocabularies and techniques in the Digital Humanities
  • Year:
  • 2013

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper wants to explore quantitative and qualitative practices generally exploited in different scientific fields (philology, mathematics, quantitative linguistics, computer science) in order to reveal forgery. Our study will be conducted on Montale's Diario postumo that shows all the typical features of a suspected forgery. The final aim is to merge all these methods in order to define a taxonomy of annotation elements useful, in this particular context of authorship attribution, for developing a data model to be potentially used in all forgery situations.