Automatic Analysis of Multimodal Group Actions in Meetings
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Models for multiparty engagement in open-world dialog
SIGDIAL '09 Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2009 Conference: The 10th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue
Attention and interaction control in a human-human-computer dialogue setting
SIGDIAL '09 Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2009 Conference: The 10th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue
IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
Proceedings of the 2010 workshop on Eye gaze in intelligent human machine interaction
SIGDIAL '11 Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2011 Conference
Towards the automatic detection of involvement in conversation
COST'10 Proceedings of the 2010 international conference on Analysis of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication and Enactment
Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Eye Gaze in Intelligent Human Machine Interaction
Visual interaction and conversational activity
Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Eye Gaze in Intelligent Human Machine Interaction
How Do We React to Context? Annotation of Individual and Group Engagement in a Video Corpus
SOCIALCOM-PASSAT '12 Proceedings of the 2012 ASE/IEEE International Conference on Social Computing and 2012 ASE/IEEE International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust
Towards developing a model for group involvement and individual engagement
Proceedings of the 15th ACM on International conference on multimodal interaction
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper is concerned with modelling individual engagement and group involvement as well as their relationship in an eight-party, mutimodal corpus. We propose a number of features (presence, entropy, symmetry and maxgaze) that summarise different aspects of eye-gaze patterns and allow us to describe individual as well as group behaviour in time. We use these features to define similarities between the subjects and we compare this information with the engagement rankings the subjects expressed at the end of each interactions about themselves and the other participants. We analyse how these features relate to four classes of group involvement and we build a classifier that is able to distinguish between those classes with 71\% of accuracy.