Which dissimilarity is to be used when extracting typologies in sequence analysis? a comparative study

  • Authors:
  • Sébastien Massoni;Madalina Olteanu;Nathalie Villa-Vialaneix

  • Affiliations:
  • Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, UMR CNRS 8174, Université Paris 1, France;SAMM, EA 4543, Université Paris 1, Paris, France;SAMM, EA 4543, Université Paris 1, Paris, France,Unité MIAT, INRA de Toulouse, Auzeville, France

  • Venue:
  • IWANN'13 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Artificial Neural Networks: advances in computational intelligence - Volume Part I
  • Year:
  • 2013

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Originally developed in bioinformatics, sequence analysis is being increasingly used in social sciences for the study of life-course processes. The methodology generally employed consists in computing dissimilarities between the trajectories and, if typologies are sought, in clustering the trajectories according to their similarities or dissemblances. The choice of an appropriate dissimilarity measure is a major issue when dealing with sequence analysis for life sequences. Several dissimilarities are available in the literature, but neither of them succeeds to become indisputable. In this paper, instead of deciding upon one dissimilarity measure, we propose to use an optimal convex combination of different dissimilarities. The optimality is automatically determined by the clustering procedure and is defined with respect to the within-class variance.