An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models
Environmental Modelling & Software
Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process - A framework and guidance
Environmental Modelling & Software
Environmental Modelling & Software
International Journal of Geographical Information Science
Sensitivity to spatial resolution of modeling systems designing air quality control policies
Environmental Modelling & Software
Management Option Rank Equivalence (MORE) - A new method of sensitivity analysis for decision-making
Environmental Modelling & Software
How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis
Environmental Modelling & Software
Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation
Environmental Modelling & Software
Uncertainty analysis in a GIS-based multi-criteria analysis tool for river catchment management
Environmental Modelling & Software
Sobol' sensitivity analysis of a complex environmental model
Environmental Modelling & Software
Review: Three complementary methods for sensitivity analysis of a water quality model
Environmental Modelling & Software
An efficient integrated approach for global sensitivity analysis of hydrological model parameters
Environmental Modelling & Software
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Criteria weights determined from pairwise comparisons are often the greatest contributor to the uncertainties in the AHP-based multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). During an MCDM process, the weights can be changed directly by adjusting the output from a pairwise comparison matrix, or indirectly by recalculating the matrix after varying its input. Corresponding weight sensitivity on multi-criteria evaluation results is generally difficult to be quantitatively assessed and spatially visualized. This study developed a unique methodology which extends the AHP-SA model proposed by Chen et al. (2010) to a more comprehensive framework to analyze weight sensitivity caused by both direct and indirect weight changes using the one-at-a-time (OAT) technique. With increased efficiency, improved flexibility and enhanced visualization capability, the spatial framework was developed as AHP-SA2 within a GIS platform. A case study with in-depth discussion is provided to demonstrate the new toolset. It assists stakeholders and researchers with better understanding of weight sensitivity for characterising, reporting and minimising uncertainty in the AHP-based spatial MCDM.