Here, there and everywhere - on the recurring use of turtle graphics in CS1
ACSE '00 Proceedings of the Australasian conference on Computing education
Test Driven Development: By Example
Test Driven Development: By Example
Programming in context: a model-first approach to CS1
Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Of black and glass boxes: scaffolding for doing and learning
ICLS '96 Proceedings of the 1996 international conference on Learning sciences
Relationships between reading, tracing and writing skills in introductory programming
ICER '08 Proceedings of the Fourth international Workshop on Computing Education Research
The FCS1: a language independent assessment of CS1 knowledge
Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education
Assessing fundamental introductory computing concept knowledge in a language independent manner
Assessing fundamental introductory computing concept knowledge in a language independent manner
Objects First with Java: A Practical Introduction Using BlueJ
Objects First with Java: A Practical Introduction Using BlueJ
Proceedings of the 7th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education
Incentivizing participation in online forums for education
Proceedings of the fourteenth ACM conference on Electronic commerce
Can first-year students program yet?: a study revisited
Proceedings of the ninth annual international ACM conference on International computing education research
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper describes the results of an ITiCSE working group convened in 2013 to review and revisit the influential ITiCSE 2001 McCracken working group that reported [18] on novice programmers' ability to solve a specified programming problem. Like that study, the one described here asked students to implement a simple program. Unlike the original study, students' in this study were given significant scaffolding for their efforts, including a test harness. Their knowledge of programming concepts was also assessed via a standard language-neutral survey. One of the significant findings of the original working group was that students were less successful at the programming task than their teachers expected, so in this study teachers' expectations were explicitly gathered and matched with students' performance. This study found a significant correlation between students' performance in the practical task and the survey, and a significant effect on performance in the practical task attributable to the use of the test harness. The study also found a much better correlation between teachers' expectations of their students' performance than in the 2001 working group.