Monotonic and non-monotonic logics of knowledge
Fundamenta Informaticae - Special issue: logics for artificial intelligence
Reasoning about knowledge
What is a logical system?
Logic and Complexity
Beautiful Security
Handbook of Modal Logic, Volume 3 (Studies in Logic and Practical Reasoning)
Handbook of Modal Logic, Volume 3 (Studies in Logic and Practical Reasoning)
A National Goal for Cyberspace: Create an Open, Accountable Internet
IEEE Security and Privacy
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
We produce a decidable classical normal modal logic of internalised negation-complete and thus disjunctive non-monotonic interactive proofs (LDiiP) from an existing logical counterpart of non-monotonic or instant interactive proofs (LiiP). LDiiP internalises agent-centric proof theories that are negation-complete (maximal) and consistent (and hence strictly weaker than, for example, Peano Arithmetic) and enjoy the disjunction property (like Intuitionistic Logic). In other words, internalised proof theories are ultrafilters and all internalised proof goals are definite in the sense of being either provable or disprovable to an agent by means of disjunctive internalised proofs (thus also called epistemic deciders). Still, LDiiP itself is classical (monotonic, non-constructive), negation-incomplete, and does not have the disjunction property. The price to pay for the negation completeness of our interactive proofs is their non-monotonicity and non-communality (for singleton agent communities only). As a normal modal logic, LDiiP enjoys a standard Kripke-semantics, which we justify by invoking the Axiom of Choice on LiiP@?s and then construct in terms of a concrete oracle-computable function. LDiiP@?s agent-centric internalised notion of proof can also be viewed as a negation-complete disjunctive explicit refinement of standard KD45-belief, and yields a disjunctive but negation-incomplete explicit refinement of S4-provability.