An improved distributed data aggregation scheduling in wireless sensor networks

  • Authors:
  • Deying Li;Qinghua Zhu;Hongwei Du;Jianzhong Li

  • Affiliations:
  • School of Information, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China 100872;School of Information, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China 100872;Shenzhen Graduate School, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, China 518055;School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China 150001

  • Venue:
  • Journal of Combinatorial Optimization
  • Year:
  • 2014

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper focuses on the distributed data aggregation collision-free scheduling problem, which is one of very important issues in wireless sensor networks. Bo et al. (Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2009) proposed an approximate distributed algorithm for the problem and Xu et al. (Proc. ACM FOWANC, 2009) proposed a centralized algorithm and its distributed implementation to generate a collision-free scheduling for the problem, which are the only two existing distributed algorithms. Unfortunately, there are a few mistakes in their performance analysis in Bo et al. (Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2009), and the distributed algorithm can not get the same latency as the centralized algorithm because the distributed implementation was not an accurate implementation of the centralized algorithm (Xu et al. in Proc. ACM FOWANC, 2009). According to those, we propose an improved distributed algorithm to generate a collision-free schedule for data aggregation in wireless sensor networks. Not an arbitrary tree in Bo et al. (Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2009) but a breadth first search tree (BFS) rooted at the sink node is adopted, the bounded latency 61R+5Δ驴67 of the schedule is obtained, where R is the radius of the network with respect to the sink node and Δ is the maximum node degree. We also correct the latency bound of the schedule in Bo et al. (Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2009) as 61D+5Δ驴67, where D is a diameter of the network and prove that our algorithm is more efficient than the algorithm (Bo et al. in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2009). We also give a latency bound for the distributed implementation in Xu et al. (Proc. ACM FOWANC, 2009).