Causality: models, reasoning, and inference
Causality: models, reasoning, and inference
Computational scenario-based capability planning
Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
Evolutionary game theoretic approach for modeling civil violence
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Application notes: MEBRA: multiobjective evolutionary-based risk assessment
IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine
Evolving stories: tree adjoining grammar guided genetic programming for complex plot generation
SEAL'10 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Simulated evolution and learning
WISDOM-II: a network centric model for warfare
KES'05 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems - Volume Part III
A fabula model for emergent narrative
TIDSE'06 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Technologies for Interactive Digital Storytelling and Entertainment
Computational Red Teaming: Past, Present and Future
IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine
Characterizing warfare in red teaming
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics
Characterizing Game Dynamics in Two-Player Strategy Games Using Network Motifs
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics
Understanding change in complex socio-technical systems
Information-Knowledge-Systems Management - Complex Socio-Technical Systems --Understanding and Influencing Causality of Change
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Causality is grounded in every scientific field. Computational modelling is no exception, except that it is our focus in this article. But what if we have made a mistake? Is causality a constraint on our understanding of complex systems? Is it an obstacle in our ability to build theories to control change in complex systems? Or do we merely need to refine the concept as we evolve from one level of complexity to another? We start the journey of this article by glancing over a few key pieces of work from Philosophy and Metaphysics. We then centre the discussion on the pivotal element of this paper, causality of change in complex systems of systems and demonstrate that a counterfactual analysis of causality breaks down. We steer the discussion more towards "change" and the separation between physical and perceptual elements. Three applications are presented as examples of the type of complexity we face in computational modelling of complex systems of systems. These three applications --covering story generation in linguistics, network centric operations in defence and interdependency security problems --demonstrate how causal dependencies can be modelled, identified and extracted from a computational environment that mimics real-world complex systems of systems. We conclude the paper with a proposed model to control change in complex systems; a model we call the E4 model.