Validation of trace-driven simulation models: regression analysis revisited

  • Authors:
  • Jack P. C. Kleijnen;Bert Bettonvil;Willem J. H. Van Groenendaal

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Information Systems and Auditing (BIKA)/Center for Economic Research (CentER), School of Management and Economics (FEW), Tilburg University (KUB), 5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands;Department of Information Systems and Auditing (BIKA)/Center for Economic Research (CentER), School of Management and Economics (FEW), Tilburg University (KUB), 5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands;Department of Information Systems and Auditing (BIKA)/Center for Economic Research (CentER), School of Management and Economics (FEW), Tilburg University (KUB), 5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands

  • Venue:
  • WSC '96 Proceedings of the 28th conference on Winter simulation
  • Year:
  • 1996

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

For the validation of trace-driven simulation models this paper recommends a simple statistical test that uses elementary regression analysis in a novel way. This test concerns a (joint) null-hypothesis: the outputs of the simulated and the real systems have the same means and the same variances. Technically, the differences between simulated and real outputs are regressed on their sums, and the resulting slope and intercept are tested to be zero. This paper further proves that it is wrong to use a naive test that regresses the simulation outputs on the real outcomes, and hypothesizes that the resulting regression line gives a 45 /spl deg/ line through the origin. The new and the old tests are investigated in Monte Carlo experiments with inventory systems. The conclusion is that the new test has the correct type I error probability, whereas the old test (falsely) rejects a valid simulation model substantially more often than the nominal alpha level. The power of the new test increases, as the simulation model deviates more from the real system.