Hermes: supporting argumentative discourse in multi-agent decision making

Authors:
Nikos Karacapilidis;Dimitris Papadias
Affiliations:
-;-
Venue:
AAAI '98/IAAI '98 Proceedings of the fifteenth national/tenth conference on Artificial intelligence/Innovative applications of artificial intelligence
Year:
1998

Citing 8
Cited 6

The complexity of some polynomial network consistency algorithms for constraint satisfaction problems

Artificial Intelligence
Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making

ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
JANUS: integrating hypertext with a knowledge-based design environment

HYPERTEXT '89 Proceedings of the second annual ACM conference on Hypertext
Conditional entailment: bridging two approaches to default reasoning

Artificial Intelligence
Burden of proof in legal argumentation

ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
The Zeno argumentation framework

Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
gIBIS: a hypertext tool for team design deliberation

HYPERTEXT '87 Proceedings of the ACM conference on Hypertext
Pleadings Game: An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice

Pleadings Game: An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice

Intelligent agents for an artificial market system

Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Autonomous agents
Graded Relative Evidence

Artificial Intelligence Review
A computational approach for argumentative discourse in multi‐agent decision making environments

AI Communications
Arguing over Actions That Involve Multiple Criteria: A Critical Review

ECSQARU '07 Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Dealing with the dynamics of proof-standard in argumentation-based decision aiding

Proceedings of the 2010 conference on STAIRS 2010: Proceedings of the Fifth Starting AI Researchers' Symposium
Conflict detection and resolution for product line design in a collaborative decision making environment

Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper describes HERMES, a system that enhances group decision making by providing an argumentation framework to the agents involved. The system organizes the existing knowledge in a discussion graph, which consists of issues, alternatives, positions and preference relations. Argumentation is performed through a set of discourse acts which trigger appropriate procedures for the propagation of information in the graph. HERMES is able to handle incomplete, qualitative and inconsistent information, and provides mechanisms for weighing arguments.