Type fixpoints: iteration vs. recursion

  • Authors:

  • Zdzisław Spławski;Paweł Urzyczyn

  • Affiliations:

  • Faculty of Informatics and Management, Wroclaw University of Technology, ul. Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland;Institute of Informatics, Wansaw University, ul. Banacha 2, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the fourth ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Functional programming
  • Year:
  • 1999

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Positive recursive (fixpoint) types can be added to the polymorphic (Church-style) lambda calculus λ2 (System F) in several different ways, depending on the choice of the elimination operator. We compare several such definitions and we show that they fall into two equivalence classes with respect to mutual interpretability by means of beta-eta reductions. Elimination operators for fixpoint types are thus classified as either "iterators" or "recursors". This classification has an interpretation in terms of the Curry-Howard correspondence: types of iterators and recursors can be seen as images of induction axioms under different dependency-erasing maps. Systems with recursors are beta-eta equivalent to a calculus λ2U of recursive types with the operators Fold: σ[μα.σ/α]←μα.σ and Unfold: μα.σ←σ[μα.σ/α], where the composition Unfold or Fold reduces to identity.It is known that systems with iterators can be defined within λ2, by means of beta reductions. We conjecture that systems with recursors can not. In this paper we show that the system λ2U does not have such a property. For this we study the notion of polymorphic type embeddability (via (beta) left-invertible terms) and we show that if a type σ is embedded into another type τ then τ must be of depth at least equal to the depth of σ.