A comparison of tiled and overlapping windows
CHI '86 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Active design reviews: principles and practices
Journal of Systems and Software
Managing the software process
ICICLE: groupware for code inspection
CSCW '90 Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work
Phased inspections and their implementation
ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
An improved inspection technique
Communications of the ACM
Does every inspection need a meeting?
SIGSOFT '93 Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT symposium on Foundations of software engineering
CAIS: collaborative asynchronous inspection of software
SIGSOFT '94 Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSOFT symposium on Foundations of software engineering
An experiment to assess cost-benefits to inspection meeting and their alternatives
An experiment to assess cost-benefits to inspection meeting and their alternatives
An empirical study of communication in code inspections
ICSE '97 Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Software engineering
An instrumented approach to improving software quality through formal technical review
ICSE '94 Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Software engineering
Distributed, Collaborative Software Inspection
IEEE Software
Comparing Detection Methods for Software Requirements Inspections: A Replicated Experiment
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Scrutiny: A Collaborative Inspection and Review System
ESEC '93 Proceedings of the 4th European Software Engineering Conference on Software Engineering
A Review of Tool Support for Software Inspection
CASE '95 Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computer-Aided Software Engineering
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
The formal document review process has basically remained unchanged since it was first introduced by Fagan in 1976. Central to this process is the review meeting, which all participants attend. However, recent empirical work has indicated that this meeting is not necessarily effective.A review model and a prototype co-operative work tool, InspectA, that dispense totally with the need for reviewers to hold face-to-face meetings, are presented. They replace the meeting with further individual reviews combined with communication between reviewers facilitated by electronic mail. The model and tool are both compared with other existing work in the area of meetingless review.