Mutual search

  • Authors:
  • Harry Buhrman;Matthew Franklin;Juan A. Garay;Jaap-Henk Hoepman;John Tromp;Paul Vitá/nyi

  • Affiliations:
  • C.W.I., Amsterdam, The Netherlands;Xerox PARC, Palo Alto, CA;Bell Labs, Murray Hill, NJ;Univ. Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands;C.W.I., Amsterdam, The Netherlands;C.W.I., Amsterdam, The Netherlands/ and Univ. of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  • Venue:
  • Journal of the ACM (JACM)
  • Year:
  • 1999

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

We introduce a search problem called “mutual search” where k agents, arbitrarily distributed over n sites, are required to locate one another by posing queries of the form “Anybody at site i?”. We ask for the least number of queries that is necessary and sufficient. For the case of two agents using deterministic protocols, we obtain the following worst-case results: In an oblivious setting (where all pre-planned queries are executed), there is no savings: n−1 queries are required and are sufficient. In a nonoblivious setting, we can exploit the paradigm of “no news is also news” to obtain significant savings: in the synchronous case 0.586n queries are required; in the asynchronous case 0.896n queries suffice and a fortiori 0.536n queries are required; for on agents using a synchronous deterministic protocol less than n queries suffice; there is a simple randomized protocol for two agents with worst-case expected 0.5n queries and all radomized protocols require at least 0.25n worst-case expected queries. The graph-theoretic framework we formulate for expressing and analyzing algorithms for this problem may be of independent interest.