Performance characteristics of microcomputer Prolog implementations

Authors:
Hal Berghel;Gregg Stubbendieck;Eric Traudt
Affiliations:
Department of Computer Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR;Department of Computer Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE;Department of Computer Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
Venue:
Proceedings of the 1986 ACM SIGSMALL/PC symposium on Small systems
Year:
1986

Citing 6
Cited 1

Programming in Prolog (2nd ed.)

Programming in Prolog (2nd ed.)
How not to lie with statistics: the correct way to summarize benchmark results

Communications of the ACM - The MIT Press scientific computation series
A comparative feature-analysis of microcomputer prolog implementations

ACM SIGPLAN Notices
Extending the capabilities of word processing software through Horn clause lexical databases

AFIPS Conference Proceedings; vol. 55 1986 National Computer Conference
Crossword compilation with Horn clauses

The Computer Journal
Spelling verification in prolog

ACM SIGPLAN Notices

MS-DOS Prolog implementations revisited

ACM SIGPLAN Notices

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In this paper we present the results of several different categories of benchmarks performed on microcomputer PROLOG interpreters and compilers. These tests were found useful in our lab in determining optimal environments for research in several different categories of non-numerical applications. The PROLOG clause sets, as well as the benchmark results, are provided.