A simulation-based study of scheduling mechanisms for a dynamic cluster environment

  • Authors:

  • Yanyong Zhang;Anand Sivasubramaniam;Jose Moreira;Hubertus Franke

  • Affiliations:

  • Department of Computer Science & Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA;Department of Computer Science & Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA;IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, P. O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY;IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, P. O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Supercomputing
  • Year:
  • 2000

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Scheduling of processes onto processors of a parallel machine has always been an important and challenging area of research. The issue becomes even more crucial and difficult as we gradually progress to the use of off-the-shelf workstations, operating systems, and high bandwidth networks to build cost-effective clusters for demanding applications. Clusters are gaining acceptance not just in scientific applications that need supercomputing power, but also in domains such as databases, web service and multimedia, which place diverse Quality-of-Service (QoS) demands on the underlying system. Further, these applications have diverse characteristics in terms of their computation, communication and I/O requirements, making conventional parallel scheduling solutions, such as space sharing or coscheduling, an unattractive option. At the same time, leaving it to the native operating system of each node to make decisions independently can lead to ineffective use of system resources whenever there is communication. Instead, an emerging class of dynamic coscheduling mechanisms, that attempt to take remedial actions to guide the system towards coscheduled execution without requiring explicit synchronization, offer a lot of promise for cluster scheduling. Using a detailed simulator, this paper evaluates the pros and cons of different dynamic coscheduling alternatives, while comparing their advantages over traditional coscheduling (and not performing any coordinated scheduling at all). The impact of dynamic job arrivals, job characteristics and different system parameters on these alternatives are evaluated in terms of several performance criteria.