On the second eigenvalue of random regular graphs
STOC '89 Proceedings of the twenty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Some optimal inapproximability results
STOC '97 Proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
STOC '99 Proceedings of the thirty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Proceedings of the ninth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
How Good is the Goemans--Williamson MAX CUT Algorithm?
SIAM Journal on Computing
Coloring 2-colorable hypergraphs with a sublinear number of colors
Nordic Journal of Computing
A 7/8-Approximation Algorithm for MAX 3SAT?
FOCS '97 Proceedings of the 38th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Gadgets Approximation, and Linear Programming
FOCS '96 Proceedings of the 37th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Approximating the value of two power proof systems, with applications to MAX 2SAT and MAX DICUT
ISTCS '95 Proceedings of the 3rd Israel Symposium on the Theory of Computing Systems (ISTCS'95)
Bipartite Subgraphs and the Smallest Eigenvalue
Combinatorics, Probability and Computing
On semidefinite programming relaxations for graph coloring and vertex cover
SODA '02 Proceedings of the thirteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Semidefinite programming based approximation algorithms, such as the Goemans and Williamson approximation algorithm for the MAX CUT problem, are usually shown to have certain performance guarantees using local ratio techniques. Are the bounds obtained in this way tight? This problem was considered before by Karloff and by Alon and Sudakov. Here we further extend their results and show, for the first time, that the local analyses of the Goemans and Williamson MAX CUT algorithm, as well as its extension by Zwick, are tight for every possible relative size of the maximum cut. We also obtain similar results for several related problems. Our approach is quite general and could possibly be applied to some additional problems and algorithms.