Document quality indicators and corpus editions

Authors:
Jeffrey A. Rydberg-Cox;Anne Mahoney;Gregory R. Crane
Affiliations:
University of Missouri at Kansas City, Department of English, Kansas City, MO;Tufts University, Perseus Project, Medford, MA;Tufts University, Perseus Project, Medford, MA
Venue:
Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
Year:
2001

Citing 5
Cited 2

Methods for evaluating the quality of hypertext links

Information Processing and Management: an International Journal - Special issue: methods and tools for the automatic construction of hypertext
An integrated reading and editing environment for scholarly research on literary works and their handwritten sources

Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Digital libraries
New technology and new roles: the need for “corpus editors”

DL '00 Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Digital libraries
The Model Editions Partnership: "Smart Text" and Beyond

The Model Editions Partnership: "Smart Text" and Beyond
Collaboration as a Key to Digital Library Development: High Performance Image Management at the University of Washington

Collaboration as a Key to Digital Library Development: High Performance Image Management at the University of Washington

Cultural Heritage Digital Libraries: Needs and Components

ECDL '02 Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries
Towards a cultural heritage digital library

Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.01

Visualization

Abstract

Corpus editions can only be useful to scholars when users know what to expect of the texts. We argue for text quality indicators, both general and domain-specific.