Maple's evaluation process as constraint contextual rewriting

Authors:
Alessandro Armando;Clemens Ballarin
Affiliations:
DIST-Univ. di Genova, Genova, Italy;Univ. Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
Venue:
Proceedings of the 2001 international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation
Year:
2001

Citing 6
Cited 3

Introduction to mathematical logic (3rd ed.)

Introduction to mathematical logic (3rd ed.)
A pragmatic approach to extending provers by computer algebra — with applications to coding theory

Fundamenta Informaticae - Special issue on symbolic computation and artificial intelligence
A Skeptic’s Approach to Combining HOL and Maple

Journal of Automated Reasoning
An Assume Facility for CAS, with a Sample Implementation for Maple

DISCO '92 Proceedings of the International Symposium on Design and Implementation of Symbolic Computation Systems
Termination of Constraint Contextual Rewriting

FroCoS '00 Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Frontiers of Combining Systems
System Description: RDL : Rewrite and Decision Procedure Laboratory

IJCAR '01 Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning

Combining Generic and Domain Specific Reasoning by Using Contexts

AISC '02/Calculemus '02 Proceedings of the Joint International Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, Automated Reasoning, and Symbolic Computation
Constraint contextual rewriting

Journal of Symbolic Computation - Special issue: First order theorem proving
A reconstruction and extension of Maple's assume facility via constraint contextual rewriting

Journal of Symbolic Computation

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Maple's evaluator, together with a feature that is usually known as the assume facility, is a combination of modules with specialised resoaning capabilities. These modules are identified, their interfaces are specified, and their interplay is reconstructed as Constraint Contextual Rewriting (CCR), a powerful form of conditional rewriting that incorporates the services provided by a decision procedure. Finally we show how Maple's evaluation process can be strengthened by borrowing ideas from CCR.