Wide-area traffic: the failure of Poisson modeling
SIGCOMM '94 Proceedings of the conference on Communications architectures, protocols and applications
Scheduling MPEG-compressed video streams with firm deadline constraints
Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Multimedia
QoS provisioning in micro-cellular networks supporting multiple classes of traffic
Wireless Networks - Special issue on wireless multimedia networking
MAC protocol and traffic scheduling for wireless ATM networks
Mobile Networks and Applications - Special issue on wireless LANs
Scheduling real-time traffic in ATM networks
INFOCOM'96 Proceedings of the Fifteenth annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies conference on The conference on computer communications - Volume 1
Wideband local access: wireless LAN and wireless ATM
IEEE Communications Magazine
Quality-of-service oriented medium access control for wireless ATM networks
IEEE Communications Magazine
Multiple access control protocols for wireless ATM: problems definition and design objectives
IEEE Communications Magazine
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
WATMnet: a prototype wireless ATM system for multimedia personal communication
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Wireless Personal Communications: An International Journal
Layouts for mobility management in wireless ATM networks
Discrete Applied Mathematics
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The MAC protocol, known as MASCARA (Mobile Access Scheme based on Contention And Reservation for ATM), is an infrastructure-based, adaptive TDMA scheme, which combines reservation- and contention-based access methods to provide multiple access efficiency and Quality-of-Service (QoS) guarantees to wireless ATM terminal connections that share a common radio channel. Radio channel sharing is performed by the PRADOS (Prioritized Regulated Allocation Delay Oriented Scheduling) algorithm. In this paper we assess the capability of PRADOS to guarantee to voice and data traffic types the QoS they need. The analysis leads to the conclusion that PRADOS cannot avoid the interference between the various types of traffic. A criterion to alleviate this drawback is also outlined at the end of the paper.