Understanding Public-Key Infrastructure: Concepts, Standards, and Deployment Considerations
Understanding Public-Key Infrastructure: Concepts, Standards, and Deployment Considerations
Can We Eliminate Certificate Revocations Lists?
FC '98 Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Financial Cryptography
On Certificate Revocation and Validation
FC '98 Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Financial Cryptography
Revocation: Options and Challenges
FC '98 Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Financial Cryptography
Efficient and Fresh Cerification
PKC '00 Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Practice and Theory in Public Key Cryptography: Public Key Cryptography
An Efficient, Dynamic and Trust Preserving Public Key Infrastructure
SP '00 Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
Efficient Certificate Revocation
Efficient Certificate Revocation
Certificate revocation and certificate update
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Merging and extending the PGP and PEM trust models-the ICE-TEL trust model
IEEE Network: The Magazine of Global Internetworking
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Problems with certificate revocation status control limit the deployment of Public Key Infrastructure (PKI). Classical certificate paths require revocation control of all certificates on the path. In this paper, we show how the recently proposed NPKI (Nested certificate based PKI) system reduces the number of revocation status controls to at most two. Our analysis also shows that NPKI is not as vulnerable as classical PKI considering the certificate authority compromise.