Implementing mathematics with the Nuprl proof development system
Implementing mathematics with the Nuprl proof development system
CADE-10 Proceedings of the tenth international conference on Automated deduction
Problem solving and cognitive skill acquisition
Foundations of cognitive science
Rippling: a heuristic for guiding inductive proofs
Artificial Intelligence
Automated Reasoning: Introduction and Applications
Automated Reasoning: Introduction and Applications
Solution of the Robbins Problem
Journal of Automated Reasoning
Explanation-Based Generalization: A Unifying View
Machine Learning
The Use of Planning Critics in Mechanizing Inductive Proofs
LPAR '92 Proceedings of the International Conference on Logic Programming and Automated Reasoning
Program Tactics and Logic Tactics
LPAR '94 Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Logic Programming and Automated Reasoning
Adapting Methods to Novel Tasks in Proof Planning
KI '94 Proceedings of the 18th Annual German Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Advances in Artificial Intelligence
Some Aspects of Analogy in Mathematical Reasoning
AII '89 Proceedings of the International Workshop on Analogical and Inductive Inference
Reconstruction Proofs at the Assertion Level
CADE-12 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Automated Deduction
Omega-MKRP: A Proof Development Environment
CADE-12 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Automated Deduction
Transforming Matings into Natural Deduction Proofs
Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Automated Deduction
Omega: Towards a Mathematical Assistant
CADE-14 Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automated Deduction
Representing and Reformulating Diagonalization Methods
Representing and Reformulating Diagonalization Methods
A tactic language for declarative proofs
ITP'10 Proceedings of the First international conference on Interactive Theorem Proving
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The reasoning power of human‐oriented plan‐based reasoning systems is primarily derived from their domain‐specific problem solving knowledge. Such knowledge is, however, intrinsically incomplete. In order to model the human ability of adapting existing methods to new situations we present in this work a declarative approach for representing methods, which can be adapted by so‐called meta‐methods. Since the computational success of this approach relies on the existence of general and strong meta‐methods, we describe several meta‐methods of general interest in detail by presenting the problem solving process of two familiar classes of mathematical problems. These examples should illustrate our philosophy of proof planning as well: besides planning with a pre‐defined repertory of methods, the repertory of methods evolves with experience in that new ones are created by meta‐methods that modify existing ones.