An empirical evaluation of knowledge compilation by theory approximation
AAAI '94 Proceedings of the twelfth national conference on Artificial intelligence (vol. 1)
Incremental recompilation of knowledge (extended abstract)
AAAI'94 Proceedings of the twelfth national conference on Artificial intelligence (vol. 2)
A class of logic problems solvable by linear programming
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Knowledge compilation and theory approximation
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Algorithms for propositional KB approximation
AAAI '98/IAAI '98 Proceedings of the fifteenth national/tenth conference on Artificial intelligence/Innovative applications of artificial intelligence
Unit Refutations and Horn Sets
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Renaming a Set of Clauses as a Horn Set
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
A survey on knowledge compilation
AI Communications
IJCAI'97 Proceedings of the 15th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence - Volume 1
An analysis of approximate knowledge compilation
IJCAI'95 Proceedings of the 14th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
Compilation for critically constrained knowledge bases
AAAI'96 Proceedings of the thirteenth national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
Fixed-parameter complexity in AI and nonmonotonic reasoning
Artificial Intelligence
First order LUB approximations: characterization and algorithms
Artificial Intelligence - Special volume on reformulation
First order LUB approximations: characterization and algorithms
Artificial Intelligence - Special volume on reformulation
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Propositional greatest lower bounds (GLBs) are logically‐defined approximations of a knowledge base. They were defined in the context of Knowledge Compilation, a technique developed for addressing high computational cost of logical inference. A GLB allows for polynomial‐time complete on‐line reasoning, although soundness is not guaranteed. In this paper we propose new algorithms for the generation of a GLB. Furthermore, we give precise characterization of the computational complexity of the problem of generating such lower bounds, thus addressing in a formal way the question “how many queries are needed to amortize the overhead of compilation?”