The Logic of Organizational Markets: Thinking Through Resource Partitioning Theory

Authors:
Ivar Vermeulen;Jeroen Bruggeman
Affiliations:
Universiteit van Amsterdam, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, Nieuwe Archtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ivar@ccsom.uva.nl;Faculty of Technology and Management, Twente University, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands. j.p.bruggeman@sms.utwente.nl
Venue:
Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory
Year:
2001

Citing 5
Cited 1

Computational organization theory

Computational organization theory
Partial deductive closure: logical simulation and management science

Management Science
On criteria for formal theory building: applying logic and automated reasoning tools to the social sciences

AAAI '99/IAAI '99 Proceedings of the sixteenth national conference on Artificial intelligence and the eleventh Innovative applications of artificial intelligence conference innovative applications of artificial intelligence
Simulation for the Social Scientist

Simulation for the Social Scientist
Resource Partitioning, the Founding of Specialist Firms, and Innovation: The American Feature Film Industry, 1912--1929

Organization Science

Putting the organization back into computational organization theory: a complex Perrowian model of organizational action

Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.01

Visualization

Abstract

Resource partitioning theory claims that “Increasing concentration enhances the life chances of specialist organizations.” We systematically think through this theory, specify implicit background assumptions, sharpen concepts, and rigorously check the theory's logic. As a result, we increase the theory's explanatory power, and claim—contrary to received opinion'that under certain general conditions, “resource partitioning” and the proliferation of specialists can take place iindependently of organizational mass and relative size effects, size localized competition, diversifying consumer tastes, increasing number of dimensions of the resource space, and changing niche widths. Our analysis makes furthermore clear that specialist and generalist strategies are asymmetric, and shows that not concentration enhances the life chances of specialists but economies of scale instead. Under the conditions explicated, we argue that if scale economies come to dominate, the number of organizations in the population increases, regardless of the incumbents' sizes.