Mean likelihood estimators

  • Authors:
  • A. I. McLeod;B. Quenneville

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Statistical and Actuarial Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B7. aim@uwo.ca;Time Series Research and Analysis Centre, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0T6. quenne@statcan.ca

  • Venue:
  • Statistics and Computing
  • Year:
  • 2001

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The use of Mathematica in deriving mean likelihood estimators is discussed. Comparisons are made between the mean likelihood estimator, the maximum likelihood estimator, and the Bayes estimator based on a Jeffrey's noninformative prior. These estimators are compared using the mean-square error criterion and Pitman measure of closeness. In some cases it is possible, using Mathematica, to derive exact results for these criteria. Using Mathematica, simulation comparisons among the criteria can be made for any model for which we can readily obtain estimators.In the binomial and exponential distribution cases, these criteria are evaluated exactly. In the first-order moving-average model, analytical comparisons are possible only for n = 2. In general, we find that for the binomial distribution and the first-order moving-average time series model the mean likelihood estimator outperforms the maximum likelihood estimator and the Bayes estimator with a Jeffrey's noninformative prior.Mathematica was used for symbolic and numeric computations as well as for the graphical display of results. A Mathematica notebook which provides the Mathematica code used in this article is available: http://www.stats.uwo.ca/mcleod/epubs/mele. Our article concludes with our opinions and criticisms of the relative merits of some of the popular computing environments for statistics researchers.