Analysis and Comparison of Location Strategies for Reducing RegistrationCost in PCS Networks

  • Authors:
  • Ing-Ray Chen;Tsong-Min Chen;Chiang Lee

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Northern Virginia Graduate Center, 7054 Haycock Road, Falls Church, VA 22043, U.S.A. E-mail: irchen@cs.vt.edu;Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan;Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

  • Venue:
  • Wireless Personal Communications: An International Journal
  • Year:
  • 2000

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In mobile environments, a personal communication service (PCS) network must keep track of the location of each mobile user in order to correctly deliver calls.A basic scheme used in the standard IS-41 and GSM protocolsis to always update the location of a mobile userwhenever the mobile user moves to a new location. The problem withthis approach is that the cost of location update operations is very highespecially when the mobile user moves frequently.In recent years, various location management strategies for reducing the location update cost have been proposed.However, the performance issue of these proposedalgorithms remains to be investigated.In this paper, we develop two Markov chains to analyze and comparethe performance of two promising location update strategies, i.e., the two location algorithm (TLA) and the forwarding and resetting algorithm (FRA).By utilizing the Markov chain, we are able to quickly answer what-ifquestions regarding the performance of PCS networks under various workload conditions and also identify conditions under which one strategy can perform better than the others.Using the cost due to locationupdate and search operations between two successive calls to a mobile user as a performance measure,we show that when the mobile user exhibits a high degree of locality and the mobile user‘s call-to-mobility ratio (CMR) is low, TLA can significantly outperform both FRA and IS-41.On the other hand, when CMR is high, FRA is the winner.Furthermore, unlike TLA which may perform worse thanIS-41 at high CMR values, FRA at identified optimal conditions can always perform at least as good as IS-41, suggesting thatFRA over TLA should be used as a genericscheme in reducing the location cost in the PCS networkto cover all possible per-user CMR values.