Management information systems: conceptual foundations, structure, and development (2nd ed.)
Management information systems: conceptual foundations, structure, and development (2nd ed.)
An introduction to quality assurance and control of software
Proc. of a symposium on Software validation: inspection-testing-verification-alternatives
Comments on practical constraints of software validation techniques
Proc. of a symposium on Software validation: inspection-testing-verification-alternatives
Guest Editor's Introduction: An Applied Psychology of the User
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
The Psychological Study of Programming
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
Validation, Verification, and Testing of Computer Software
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
Studying programmer behavior experimentally: the problems of proper methodology
Communications of the ACM
Systems Analysis and Design: Traditional Structured and Advanced Concepts and Techniques
Systems Analysis and Design: Traditional Structured and Advanced Concepts and Techniques
Structured Design: Fundamentals of a Discipline of Computer Program and Systems Design
Structured Design: Fundamentals of a Discipline of Computer Program and Systems Design
Management information requirements assessment: the state of the art
ACM SIGMIS Database
Software psychology: Human factors in computer and information systems (Winthrop computer systems series)
Recent advances in software measurement (abstract and references for talk)
ICSE '90 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Software engineering
Factors that Impact Implementing a System Development Methodology
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
A refresher in data flow diagramming: an effective aid for analysts
Communications of the ACM - Why CS students need math
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
While validation of user requirements has become an important goal for information system designers, little empirical research has been done in this area. Many methodologies have been presented as the best procedures for achieving user validation of design. An attempt is made to consider four of these methodologies in four different experimental settings. In the four experiments, the following treatments were examined: HIPO (hierarchy plus input, process, and output) vs. system flowcharts; DFD (data-flow diagram) narrative; DFD vs. Warnier-Orr diagrams; and DFD vs. HIPO. The main result of all four experiments was that choice of design methodology had no effect on the level of user understanding of system requirements.