Open-source documentation: in search of user-driven, just-in-time writing
SIGDOC '01 Proceedings of the 19th annual international conference on Computer documentation
The FreeBSD Project: A Replication Case Study of Open Source Development
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
IEEE Software
Empirical study of the effects of open source adoption on software development economics
Journal of Systems and Software
Managerial and technical barriers to the adoption of open source software
ICCBSS'05 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on COTS-Based Software Systems
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
My, how the world has changed. IBM is now backing Apache, Netscape has put an extraordinary amount of useful software out into the open, and vendors such as Metrowerks, Sybase and Oracle have released versions of their tools to run on a give-away operating system. It seems that the open-source movement-Linux, Perl, Apache, and their many cousins-has finally hit the big time. But my, how the world has stayed the same. EGGS (a derivative of the Free Software Foundation's GNU C++) is one of the few compilers around that has kept pace with the ANSI standard, but CVS, the open-source version control system, is 1O years behind equivalent commercial offerings. Linux is now more robust than some commercial varieties of Unix, but it's impossible to compare the reliability of open-source project management tools to that of Microsoft Project because the former don't exist