CYC: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure
Communications of the ACM
Infomaster: an information integration system
SIGMOD '97 Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
The TSIMMIS Approach to Mediation: Data Models and Languages
Journal of Intelligent Information Systems - Special issue: next generation information technologies and systems
The Yin/Yang web: XML syntax and RDF semantics
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web
OIL: An Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web
IEEE Intelligent Systems
Information Integration: The MOMIS Project Demonstration
VLDB '00 Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases
Querying Heterogeneous Information Sources Using Source Descriptions
VLDB '96 Proceedings of the 22th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases
Intelligent Systems for Tourism
IEEE Intelligent Systems
Conceptual model of web service reputation
ACM SIGMOD Record
OWL DL vs. OWL flight: conceptual modeling and reasoning for the semantic Web
WWW '05 Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web
OWL FA: a metamodeling extension of OWL D
Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web
On the properties of metamodeling in OWL
ISWC'05 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on The Semantic Web
Reordering query and rule patterns for query answering in a rete-based inference engine
WISE'05 Proceedings of the 2005 international conference on Web Information Systems Engineering
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this article, eight people from different communities, including applications, description logics and frame logic, express their view of a Web ontology language. They had complete freedom in forming their statements, but they focused on these core questions: (1) What is the single most important property of a Web ontology language? (2) Taking a formal semantics for granted, should a Web ontology language be based on description logics such as OIL (Ontology Inference Layer) or DAML (DARPA Agent Markup Language) + OIL? (3) How should we communicate a Web ontology language to developers? Much has been said about the dire nature of a Web ontology language's standardization. This being so, where do its beauty and its excitements lie? The answer is KISSES - Keep It Straight, Simple and ExtenSible. There are, of course, different opinions. So what does this boil down to from the technical view? The authors tell you how ontologies' KISSES move them.