A note on three-way two-dimensional alternating Turing machines
Information Sciences: an International Journal
A survey of two-dimensional automata theory
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Some results concerning 2-D on-line tessellation acceptors and 2-D alternating finite automata
Theoretical Computer Science
Turing Machines with Sublogarithmic Space
Turing Machines with Sublogarithmic Space
Some Results Concerning Two-Dimensional Turing Machines and Finite Automata
FCT '95 Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Fundamentals of Computation Theory
Formal languages and their relation to automata
Formal languages and their relation to automata
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper investigates non-closure properties of the classes of sets accepted by space-bounded two-dimensional alternating Turing machines and three-way two-dimensional alternating Turing machines. Let 2-ATM(L(m, n)) (resp., TR2-ATM(L(m, n))) be the class of sets accepted by L(m, n) space-bounded two-dimensional alternating Turing machines (resp., L(m, n) space-bounded three-way two-dimensional alternating Turing machines), where L(m, n): N2 → N ∪ {0} (N denotes the set of all the positive integers) is a function with two variables m ( = the number of rows of input tapes) and n (= the number of columns of input tapes). We show that (i) for any function g(n) = o(logn) (resp., g(n) = o(logn/log log n)) and any monotonic non-decreasing function f(m) which can be constructed by some one-dimensional deterministic Turing machine, 2-ATM(L(m,n)) and TR2-ATM(L(m,n)) are not closed under column catenation, column +, and projection, and (ii) for any function f(m) = o(logm) (resp., f(m) = o(logm/log log m)) and any monotonic non-decreasing function g(n)which can be constructed by some one-dimensional deterministic Turing machine, 2-ATM(L(m, n)) and TR2-ATM(L(m, n)) are not closed under row catenation, row +, and projection, where L(m, n) = f(m) + g(n) (resp., L(m, n) = f(m) × g(n)).