A reliable dissemination protocol for interactive collaborative applications
Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Multimedia
The case for reliable concurrent multicasting using shared ACK trees
MULTIMEDIA '96 Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Multimedia
A reliable multicast framework for light-weight sessions and application level framing
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON)
A comparison of reliable multicast protocols
Multimedia Systems
Organizing multicast receivers deterministically by packet-loss correlation
MULTIMEDIA '98 Proceedings of the sixth ACM international conference on Multimedia
A bandwidth analysis of reliable multicast transport protocols
COMM '00 Proceedings of NGC 2000 on Networked group communication
Scaling End-to-End Multicast Transports with a Topologically-Sensitive Group Formation Protocol
ICNP '99 Proceedings of the Seventh Annual International Conference on Network Protocols
A comparison of sender-initiated and receiver-initiated reliable multicast protocols
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Reliable multicast transport protocol (RMTP)
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
Deployment issues for the IP multicast service and architecture
IEEE Network: The Magazine of Global Internetworking
Multicast routing algorithms and protocols: a tutorial
IEEE Network: The Magazine of Global Internetworking
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Even though tree-based reliable multicast protocols are known to be most scalable for one-to-many sessions, there is still an open question whether these protocols are also scalable for many-to-many sessions. In this paper, we analyze and compare two promising multicast protocols - the receiver-initiated protocol with NACK suppression and the tree-based protocol - using a new spatial loss model. The proposed model considers the correlation of packet loss events for more realistic analysis unlike the previous work. The analysis results show that the tree-based protocol achieves much higher throughput than the receiver-initiated protocol for a many-to-many session as the number of participants in the session becomes larger.