Adaptive load sharing in homogeneous distributed systems
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
DIB—a distributed implementation of backtracking
ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS)
Location Independent Remote Execution in NEST
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Distributed process groups in the V Kernel
ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS)
Host groups: a multicast extension for datagram internetworks
SIGCOMM '85 Proceedings of the ninth symposium on Data communications
Preemptable remote execution facilities for the V-system
Proceedings of the tenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles
The “worm” programs—early experience with a distributed computation
Communications of the ACM
The LOCUS distributed operating system
SOSP '83 Proceedings of the ninth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles
SOSP '83 Proceedings of the ninth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles
The distributed V kernel and its performance for diskless workstations
SOSP '83 Proceedings of the ninth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles
Process Migration in the Sprite Operating System
Process Migration in the Sprite Operating System
An Empirical Investigation of Load Indices for Load Balancing
An Empirical Investigation of Load Indices for Load Balancing
A Trace-Driven Simulation Study of Dynamic Load Balancing
A Trace-Driven Simulation Study of Dynamic Load Balancing
Shared virtual memory on loosely coupled multiprocessors
Shared virtual memory on loosely coupled multiprocessors
Bibliography on network management
ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Decentralized resource management in distributed systems has become more practical with the availability of communication facilities that support multicasting. In this paper we present several example solutions for managing resources in a decentralized fashion, using multicasting facilities. We review the properties of these solutions in terms of scalability, fault tolerance and efficiency. We conclude that decentralized solutions compare favorably to centralized solutions with respect to all three criteria.