Various views on spatial prepositions
AI Magazine
Similarity, typicality, and categorization
Similarity and analogical reasoning
A three-dimensional spatial model for the interpretation of image data
Representation and processing of spatial expressions
Language and Spatial Cognition
Language and Spatial Cognition
Projective relations for 3D space: computational model, application, and psychological evaluation
AAAI'97/IAAI'97 Proceedings of the fourteenth national conference on artificial intelligence and ninth conference on Innovative applications of artificial intelligence
Reference Frames for Spatial Inference in Text Understanding
Spatial Cognition, An Interdisciplinary Approach to Representing and Processing Spatial Knowledge
Towards Cognitive Adequacy of Topological Spatial Relations
Spatial Cognition II, Integrating Abstract Theories, Empirical Studies, Formal Methods, and Practical Applications
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The chapter provides an overview of linguistic, neuropsychological and experimental psychological approaches and findings that support the idea that spatial relation categories are analog, overlapping, internally structured categories based on prototype comparison and with fuzzy boundaries. The main focus is on viewpoint dependent relations (direction relations) in visuospatial cognition. The notion of a frame of reference in spatial cognition is related to the more general concept of a frame of reference in categorization. Categorization constitutes the bridge between spatial vision and spatial language. For visual space, a spatial framework is proposed that is based on perceptually salient directions which act as standard values in relation to which object relations can be judged.