A risk-driven method for eXtreme programming release planning
Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering
A framework for characterization and analysis of software system scalability
Proceedings of the the 6th joint meeting of the European software engineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT symposium on The foundations of software engineering
Towards Engineering Purposeful Systems: A Requirements Engineering Perspective
DEXA '08 Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications
Requirements trade-offs analysis in the absence of quantitative measures: a heuristic method
Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
Using an SMT solver for interactive requirements prioritization
Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSOFT symposium and the 13th European conference on Foundations of software engineering
Software requirements negotiation using the software quality function deployment
CRIWG'05 Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Groupware: design, Implementation, and Use
Comparing alternatives for analyzing requirements trade-offs - In the absence of numerical data
Information and Software Technology
From conceptual modeling to requirements engineering
ER'06 Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Conceptual Modeling
Interactive requirements prioritization using a genetic algorithm
Information and Software Technology
Uncertainty handling in goal-driven self-optimization - Limiting the negative effect on adaptation
Journal of Systems and Software
A systematic literature review of software requirements prioritization research
Information and Software Technology
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Many software projects have failed because their requirements were poorly negotiated among stakeholders. This paper proposes a systematic model, called "Multi-Criteria Preference Analysis Requirements Negotiation (MPARN)" to assist stakeholders to evaluate, negotiate, and agree upon alternatives among stakeholders during requirements analysis using multi-criteria preference analysis techniques. The eight-step MPARN model is applied to requirements gathered for an industrial-academic repository system. An initial analysisdemonstrates that multi-criteria preference analysis methodology with the WinWin model potentially increases stakeholders' levels of cooperation and trust by providing a systematic approach to the design of a better negotiation process, as well as focusing on unbiased aspects within a requirements negotiation.