On the Difference between Polynomial-Time Many-One and Truth-Table Reducibilities on Distributional Problems

  • Authors:
  • Shin Aida;Rainer Schuler;Tatsuie Tsukiji;Osamu Watanabe

  • Affiliations:
  • -;-;-;-

  • Venue:
  • STACS '01 Proceedings of the 18th Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science
  • Year:
  • 2001

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In this paper we separate many-one reducibility from truthtable reducibility for distributional problems in DistNP under the hypothesis that P ≠ NP. As a first example we consider the 3-Satisfiability problem (3SAT) with two different distributions on 3CNF formulas. We show that 3SAT using a version of the standard distribution is truth-table reducible but not many-one reducible to 3SAT using a less redundant distribution unless P = NP. We extend this separation result and define a distributional complexity class C with the following properties: (1) C is a subclass of DistNP, this relation is proper unless P = NP. (2) C contains DistP, but it is not contained in AveP unless DistNP ⊆ AveZPP. (3) C has a ≤mp-complete set. (4) C has a ≤ttp-complete set that is not ≤mp-complete unless P = NP. This shows that under the assumption that P ≠ NP, the two completeness notions differ on some non-trivial subclass of DistNP.