ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS)
Artificial Intelligence
Integration of weighted knowledge bases
Artificial Intelligence
Combining Multiple Knowledge Bases
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
Multisensor Data Fusion in Situation Assessment Processes
ECSQARU/FAPR '97 Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Qualitative and Quantitative Practical Reasoning
Merging with Integrity Constraints
ECSQARU '95 Proceedings of the European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty
Proving theorems in a multi-source environment
IJCAI'93 Proceedings of the 13th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence - Volume 1
Assessing the value of a candidate: comparing belief function and possibility theories
UAI'99 Proceedings of the Fifteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence
Logic-based approaches to information fusion
Information Fusion
Using Logic to Understand Relations between DSmT and Dempster-Shafer Theory
ECSQARU '09 Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Non-exclusive hypotheses in Dempster--Shafer Theory
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper addresses the problem of merging data provided by several sources of information. It aims at comparing two techniques of merging, one provided by Theory of Evidence and the other provided in the field of logic for merging knowledge-bases. For doing so, it first presents a logical interpretation of Theory of Evidence, which is proved to be valid when the numbers are rational. Then, it shows the equivalence between the Maximum of Plausibility Decision Strategy of Theory of Evidence and a particular knowldege-bases merging operator, known to be a majority and also an arbitration operator.