On the power of quantum finite state automata
FOCS '97 Proceedings of the 38th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
1-way quantum finite automata: strengths, weaknesses and generalizations
FOCS '98 Proceedings of the 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
SOFSEM '00 Proceedings of the 27th Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Informatics
Quantum versus deterministic counter automata
Theoretical Computer Science
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Quantum finite automata were introduced by C. Moore, J. P. Crutchfield [4], and by A. Kondacs and J. Watrous [3]. This notion is not a generalization of the deterministic finite automata. Moreover, in [3] it was proved that not all regular languages can be recognized by quantum finite automata. A. Ambainis and R. Freivalds [1] proved that for some languages quantum finite automata may be exponentially more concise rather than both deterministic and probabilistic finite automata. In this paper we introduce the notion of quantum finite multitape automata and prove that there is a language recognized by a quantum finite automaton but not by deterministic or probabilistic finite automata. This is the first result on a problem which can be solved by a quantum computer but not by a deterministic or probabilistic computer. Additionally we discover unexpected probabilistic automata recognizing complicated languages.