Adaptation in natural and artificial systems
Adaptation in natural and artificial systems
DISCOUNT - A Distributed and Learning Equational Prover
Journal of Automated Reasoning
SETHEO and E-SETHEO - The CADE-13 Systems
Journal of Automated Reasoning
E-SETHEO: Design, Configuration and Use of a Parallel Automated Theorem Prover
AI '99 Proceedings of the 12th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Advanced Topics in Artificial Intelligence
Strategy Selection by Genetic Programming
Proceedings of the Twelfth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference
p-SETHEO: Strategy Parallelism in Automated Theorem Proving
TABLEAUX '98 Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods
PARTHEO: A High-Performance Parallel Theorem Prover
Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automated Deduction
A Novel Asynchronous Parallelism Scheme for First-Order Logic
CADE-12 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Automated Deduction
CADE-12 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Automated Deduction
CADE-13 Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Automated Deduction: Automated Deduction
Integration of Automated and Interactive Theorem Proving in ILP
CADE-14 Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automated Deduction
Adaptive parallel iterative deepening search
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Hi-index | 0.00 |
One of the key issues in automated theorem proving is the search for optimal proof strategies. Since there is not one uniform strategy which works optimally on all proof tasks, one is faced with the difficult problem of selecting a good strategy for a given task. Strategy parallelism is a way of circumventing this strategy selection problem. However, the problem of selecting the parallel strategies and distributing the available resources remains. Therefore we have developed a method for strategy evaluation and selection based on training data. We present a theorem prover system which has been automated with respect to the entire process of theorem prover application including automatic data generation, automatic schedule selection and classical automated theorem proving. In the theorem prover e-SETHEO, we present an implementation of such a system that, for the first time, can handle the necessary problem domain adaption fully automatically and which is an improvement of the prover which solved the largest number of problems in the MIX division of the CADE-16 ATP competition. This is followed by some experimental data produced with this system. We address the problem of test set extraction and give an assessment of our work as well as a lookout to future research issues.