CNLS '89 Proceedings of the ninth annual international conference of the Center for Nonlinear Studies on Self-organizing, Collective, and Cooperative Phenomena in Natural and Artificial Computing Networks on Emergent computation
Understanding intelligence
Nonlinear and synthetic models for primate societies
Dynamics in human and primate societies
Catching Ourselves in the Act: Situated Activity, Interactive Emergence, Evolution, and Human Thought
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
IJCAI'91 Proceedings of the 12th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
The artificial life roots of artificial intelligence
Artificial Life
Modeling adaptive autonomous agents
Artificial Life
A biological perspective on autonomous agent design
Robotics and Autonomous Systems
Entelechy and embodiment in (artistic) human-computer interaction
HCI'07 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human-computer interaction: interaction design and usability
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The impact of technology on thinking about behaviour has shifted from mechanistic descriptions towards the computational stance of cognitive science and classical Artificial Intelligence. All these approaches share an output-oriented black-box rationalism, which is also the foundation of neo-Darwinistic accounts of behaviour. To gauge the limitations of this type of explanations and of ethological methods in particular, I analysed the behaviour of simple robots as if they were living creatures. This revealed interesting patterns but did not take the lid of the black box. The self-organized cooperative behaviour of the robots could only be understood if feedback from environmental changes was considered. Furthermore, the robots were not designed by "engineering from scratch" or a "problem-solving approach", but instead by an almost task-free attitude without preconceptions like "imperfect design" and "behavioural errors". This questions the use of a priori stated "costs" and "benefits", and thus is at odds with the starting points of normative and rationalistic theorizing.